NHẬN THỨC CỦA SINH VIÊN CHUYÊN NGỮ VỀ PHẢN HỒI SỬA LỖI BẰNG LỜI NÓI CỦA GIẢNG VIÊNTRONG CÁC GIỜ HỌC NÓI TIẾNG ANH Ở VIỆT NAM

Các tác giả

  • Hồ Văn Quang Tác giả
  • Nguyễn Thị Bảo Trang Tác giả
  • Trương Bạch Lê Tác giả

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63506/jilc.0903.362

Từ khóa:

phản hồi sửa lỗi; phản hồi sửa lỗi bằng lời nói của giáo viên; sinh viên chuyên ngành tiếng Anh; nhận thức; kỹ năng nói tiếng Anh như một ngoại ngữ

Tóm tắt

Trong hơn hai thập kỷ qua, phản hồi sửa lỗi (CF) ở cả dạng nói và dạng viết đã trở thành một chủ đề nổi bật trong giảng dạy và nghiên cứu ngôn ngữ. Tuy vậy, cách sinh viên đại học chuyên tiếng Anh nhìn nhận về phản hồi sửa lỗi bằng lời nói của giáo viên vẫn chưa được tìm hiểu nhiều. Nghiên cứu này khảo sát quan điểm của sinh viên năm hai chuyên ngữ tiếng Anh đối với phản hồi sửa lỗi của giáo viên  trong các giờ học nói tiếng Anh tại một trường đại học ở miền Trung Việt Nam. Nghiên cứu thu thập dữ liệu bảng hỏi từ 200 sinh viên. Kết quả cho thấy sinh viên đánh giá cao phản hồi sửa lỗi của giáo viên, đặc biệt khi tập trung vào những lỗi cản trở quá trình giao tiếp hoặc lỗi lặp lại thường xuyên. Sinh viên mong muốn nhận được những phản hồi sửa lỗi từ giáo viên sau khi họ hoàn thành lượt nói của mình. Các chiến lược sửa lỗi như gợi ý siêu ngôn ngữ, tái diễn mang tính giảng giải và sửa lỗi trực tiếp được đánh giá cao. Những phát hiện này mang lại các gợi ý thực tiễn cho giáo viên trong việc cung cấp phản hồi sửa lỗi kịp thời, đúng trọng tâm và hiệu quả trong các lớp học nói tiếng Anh.

Số lượng Tải xuống

Dữ liệu tải xuống chưa có sẵn.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Albarqi, G., & Tavakoli, P. (2023). The effects of proficiency level and dual-task condition on L2 self-monitoring behavior. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 45(1), 212–233. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263122000146

Baz, E. H., Balçıkanlı, C., & Cephe, P. T. (2016). Perceptions of English instructors and learners about corrective feedback. European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 1(1), 54–68. https://oapub.org/edu/index.php/ejfl/article/view/331/848

Brandmo, C., & Gamlem, S. M. (2025). Students’ perceptions and outcome of teacher feedback: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1572950

Carroll, S., & Swain, M. (1993). Explicit and implicit negative feedback: An empirical study of the learning of linguistic generalizations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15(3), 357–386. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100012158

Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D. & Snow, M. A. (2014). Teaching English as a second or foreign language (4th ed.). Heinle ELT.

Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://collegepublishing.sagepub.com/products/designing-and-conducting-mixed-methods-research-3-241842

Fowler, F. J. (2013). Survey research methods (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/book/survey-research-methods-4

Ha, X. V., & Nguyen, L. T. (2021). Targets and sources of oral corrective feedback in English as a foreign language classrooms: Are students’ and teachers’ beliefs aligned? Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.697160

Ha, X. V., Murray, J. C., & Riazi, A. M. (2021a). High school EFL students’ beliefs about oral corrective feedback: The role of gender, motivation and extraversion. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 235–264. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2021.11.2.4

Ha, X. V., Nguyen, L. T., & Bui, H. P. (2021b). Oral corrective feedback in English as a foreign language classrooms: A teaching and learning perspective. Heliyon, 7(7),. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07550

Havnes, A., Smith, K., Dysthe, O., & Ludvigsen, K. (2012). Formative assessment and feedback: Making learning visible. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 38(1), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2012.04.001

Hossain, K. I., Ahmed, M. K., & Mahmud, M. S. (2024). A Comprehensive review on the impact of teacher feedback in language development for ESL/EFL learners. IUBAT Review, 7(1), 218–229. https://doi.org/10.3329/iubatr.v7i1.74421

Jonsson, A. (2013). Facilitating productive use of feedback in higher education. Active Learning in Higher Education, 14(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787412467125

Kaewkascholkul, N., & Jaturapitakkul, N. (2023). Thai teacher’s corrective feedback on adult learners’ errors in speaking. THAITESOL Journal, 36(2), 39–60. https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/thaitesoljournal/article/view/269075

Kartchava, E. (2019). Noticing oral corrective feedback in the second language classroom: Background and evidence. Bloomsbury. https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/noticing-oral-corrective-feedback-in-the-second-language-classroom-9781498536790/

Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon Press. https://archive.org/details/principlespracti0000kras/page/n9/mode/2up

Lee, E. J. (2013). Corrective feedback preferences and learner repair among advanced ESL students. System, 41(2), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.01.022

Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60(2), 309–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00561.x

Li, S., Ou, L., & Lee, I. (2025). The timing of corrective feedback in second language learning. Language Teaching, 59(1), 29-45. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444824000478

Li, S., Zhu, Y., & Ellis, R. (2016). The effects of the timing of corrective feedback on the acquisition of a new linguistic structure. The Modern Language Journal, 100(1), 276–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12315

Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. De Bot, R. B. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross cultural perspective (pp. 39–52). John Benjamins. https://chooser.crossref.org/?doi=10.1075%2Fsibil.2.07lon

Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 37-66. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197001034

Lyster, R., & Saito, K. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 265–302. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990520

Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M. (2013). Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 46(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444812000365

Maghfiroh, S. A., Wahyuni, S., & Winarto, A. E. (2024). Tutors’ corrective feedback and students’ preferences in an English course at Kampung Inggris Pare, Indonesia. English Education Journal of English Teaching and Research, 9(2), 232–239. https://doi.org/10.29407/jetar.v9i2.21592

Mahara, A. D., & Hartono, D. (2024). The effect of corrective feedback to improve students’ motivation in speaking skills A perspective from EFL learners. Cetta Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 7(4), 42–53. https://doi.org/10.37329/cetta.v7i4.3649

Mahmoud, G. H. A. A. (2018). Effects of corrective feedback on learners of English as a Second Language (ESL). International Journal of Education (IJE), 6(4), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.5121/ije.2018.6405

Maruf, N., Liu, Y., Halyna, K., Anwar, K., & Santoso, R. A. (2025). Enhancing language learning through gesture-based corrective feedback: A comparative study in a multi-country context. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(3), 612–625. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v14i3.74501

Muslem, A., Zulfikar, T., Astilla, I., Heriansyah, H., & Marhaban, S. (2021). Students’ perception toward oral corrective feedback in speaking classes: A case at English Education Department students. International Journal of Language Education, 5(4), 244-259. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v5i4.19010

Nassaji, H. (2015). The interactional feedback dimension in instructed second language learning: Linking theory, research, and practice. Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474219068

Nguyen, T. P. U., & Nguyen, P. T. U. (2022). Pre-service teacher performance and high-school student uptake of oral corrective feedback in EFL classes in Da Nang. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 2(2), 119–141. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijte.22227

Nhac, T. H. (2022). Oral corrective feedback preferences in English lessons: Learners’ and teachers’ perspectives. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(3), 1643-1655. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.3.1643

Oladejo, J. A. (1993). Error correction in ESL: Learners’ preferences. TESL Canada Journal, 10(2), 71–89. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v10i2.619

Ölmezer-öztürk, E., & Öztürk, G. (2016). Types and timing of oral corrective feedback in EFL classrooms: Voices from students. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 10(2), 113–133. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1167213.pdf

Panova, I., & Lyster, R. (2002). Patterns of corrective feedback and uptake in an adult ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 36(4), 573–595. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588241

Pimentel, J. L. (2010). A note on the usage of Likert scaling for research data analysis. USM R&D Journal, 18(2), 109–112. https://uqac.usm.edu.ph/pluginfile.php/10133/mod_folder/content/0/File%203.pdf

Ranta, L., & Lyster, R. (2007). A cognitive approach to improving immersion students’ oral language abilities: The awareness–practice–feedback sequence. In R. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp. 141–160). Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/practice-in-a-second-language/cognitive-approach-to-improving-immersion-students-oral-language-abilities-the-awarenesspracticefeedback-sequence/C91C71DB36305742E5E2FA24989969DF?utm

Roothooft, H., & Breeze, R. (2016). A comparison of EFL teachers’ and students’ attitudes toward oral corrective feedback. Language Awareness, 25(4), 318–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2016.1235580

Saeb, F. (2017). Students’ and teachers’ perceptions and preferences for oral corrective feedback: Do they match? International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 6(4), 32–44. https://www.aiac.org.au/journals/index.php/IJALEL/article/view/3119/2582

Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129

Schulz, R. A. (2001). Cultural differences in student and teacher perceptions concerning the role of grammar instruction and corrective feedback: USA–Colombia. The Modern Language Journal, 85(2), 244–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00107

Sheen, Y. (2011). Corrective feedback, individual differences and second language learning. In Educational linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0548-7

Sheen, Y., & Ellis, R. (2011). Corrective feedback in language teaching. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. 2, pp. 593–610). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780203836507-41/corrective-feedback-language-teaching-younghee-sheen-rod-ellis

Taber, K. S. (2017). The use of Cronbach’s Alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2

Tran, T. D., Tran, H. N., Au, M. T., Dang, T. B. D., Le, V. L., & Nguyen, T. K. H. (2024). Students’ perception of teachers’ oral corrective feedback on speaking performance: A case at a university in Vietnam. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(3), 162–172. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1475178.pdf

Vu, T. T. (2025). Recent trends in English Language education in Vietnam. English Today, 41(2), 121–126. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266078424000506

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. https://www.perlego.com/book/1147807/mind-in-society-development-of-higher-psychological-processes-pdf?partner_id=100014&utm_source=jstor&utm_medium=affiliate&utm_campaign=jstor-referral

Weekly, R., Pollard, A., & Macpherson, J. (2022). EAP corrective feedback in an EMI setting: Student and teacher beliefs. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2022.101157

Yu, S. (2024). Peer assessment in writing instruction. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/peer-assessment-in-writing-instruction/FD624A3F4E6614078528644E6AE6BFEB

Zhang, C., Bowen, N. E., & Thomas, N. (2025). Oral corrective feedback and learner uptake: An analysis of Chinese high-school teachers’ practices in a national teaching competition. Classroom Discourse, 16(4), 437-460. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2025.2474233

Zhang, J., Cao, X., & Zheng, N. (2022). How learners’ corrective feedback beliefs Modulate their oral accuracy: A comparative study on high- and low-accuracy learners of Chinese as a second language. Frontiers in Psychology, 13,. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.869468

Zhang, L. J., & Rahimi, M. (2014). EFL learners’ anxiety level and their beliefs about corrective feedback in oral communication classes. System, 42, 429–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.01.012

Tải xuống

Đã Xuất bản

29.12.2025

Số

Chuyên mục

Bài báo

Cách trích dẫn

NHẬN THỨC CỦA SINH VIÊN CHUYÊN NGỮ VỀ PHẢN HỒI SỬA LỖI BẰNG LỜI NÓI CỦA GIẢNG VIÊNTRONG CÁC GIỜ HỌC NÓI TIẾNG ANH Ở VIỆT NAM. (2025). TẠP CHÍ KHOA HỌC NGÔN NGỮ VÀ VĂN HÓA, 9(3), 403-422. https://doi.org/10.63506/jilc.0903.362

Các bài báo được đọc nhiều nhất của cùng tác giả

Các bài báo tương tự

31-40 của 221

Bạn cũng có thể bắt đầu một tìm kiếm tương tự nâng cao cho bài báo này.